I spoke to a really lovely person today, KW who works at Sydney University. We begun talking about spiritual matters. She said something really interesting: “Religion doesn’t really do it for me – I don’t really care about where you go when you die, I’m more concerned for the things in the here and now.” Having just known her superficially for a couple of years, I was so struck today with her genuine concern for the wellbeing of others, and her desire for the problems of the world – the wars, the injustices – to be solved. She (humbly) didn’t think she could do anything about all those big issues, but she did her part in her daily life in doing good to those around her. I think her outlook is reflected in the thoughts of heaps of my dear friends.
So something really surprised me this evening.I’ve been reading a book about coming back from the dead – called The Resurrection of the Son of God by NT Wright. It said this:
“The hope of [old testament] biblical writers, which was strong and constant, focussed not upon the fate of humans after death, but on the fate of Israel and her promised land. The nation and land of the present world were far more important than what happened to an individual after death” (p 99). I think this really rings true in what I know of the Old Testament – people are constantly crying out for God to rescue them from their enemies; prophets are calling people to turn to God to avert a pending invasion by another country; kings and commoners lament that injustice runs riot in the land.
This is why kids and grandkids are so important in those times – to see them was a great joy, to not have any was a tragedy, all because the hope of the nation rested on them. To continue the nation in peace, justice and prosperity relied on these little ones growing up and running things properly. This goes right back to the hope of the first humans, when Eve was pronounced “the mother of all living” (genesis 3:16,20) after the influence of evil came into the world. It’s in the promise to Abraham in Genesis 12, when immense blessing for every nation on earth is tied up with his family and the land they live on.
KW seems to be more in line with God’s plans than she thought. At least in the times before Jesus, they were very concerned with the “here and now” (“there and then”). Perhaps I and other Christians don’t appreciate this enough today. Did Jesus get rid of this and get our focus rightly on non-earthly concerns? Or have we just got lazy and stopped connecting him with the world (not to mention the individuals) he came to save?
But if it’s true that KW’s desires are in line with the god depicted in the Old Testament, does that mean that she doesn’t need him, that she’s already got the morals she needs? I’d say that in this level of the conversation, morals aren’t the issue, actually, it’s about the ability to change things. If the OT god, and the god of Jesus, is really concerned for the things of the here and now, and has made promises to do something about them, perhaps the question really is: Can he do it? Because if he can, there’s good news right there.